Beyond Your Blog recently published an article called 14 Ways To Piss Off An Editor. In it, we detailed several of the contributor behaviors that irritate editors. Now, we’re giving bloggers a chance to share some of their pet peeves about websites they are contributing to.
We solicited feedback from many bloggers who are contributing to online magazines and websites, and this is what they said:
1. Mistakes In The Bio
Spelling an author’s name wrong, forgetting or putting in incorrect social media links, or, in one case, putting in a bio for the wrong author, are all big disappointments for bloggers. When a site promises exposure and traffic instead of payment, getting the bio information correct is critical for the contributor to have a good experience.
2. Social Media Faux Pas
When promoting a contributor’s writing, please, PLEASE tag them! While contributors should be following a site’s social media, it can be time-consuming to check Facebook, Twitter, Google+ etc. all day long to see if a site has posted a promotion of your piece that you should be sharing, commenting on etc. One contributor had a site tag the wrong author in a Tweet and we’ve also seen typos in social media promotion, which don’t add to share-ability or professionalism.
3. Poor Promotion
If you’re offering exposure in lieu of payment, contributors are looking for promotion via social media or other means (newsletters etc.). Sharing on Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest, and other sites is appreciated, and considered good host site etiquette. Expecting the contributor to be the only one promoting, is not.
4. Over Editing
This is a touchy one. While a writer needs to trust that the editor knows their audience best, some contributors mentioned being irritated when a site edits their voice out of a piece completely without allowing for review.
Not hearing back from editors is a particularly big thorn in the side of contributors. While no one likes being rejected, a rejection email is preferred over no contact at all. Contributors also like getting an automated response letting them know the submission was received so they don’t have to play ‘what if’ games in their mind about it being lost in cyber space. If rejection notices are not given, providing a timeframe for when a blogger can expect an acceptance/assume a rejection is very helpful. This allows a contributor to move on and submit elsewhere if they haven’t heard, without worrying about having duplicate active submissions out there.
6. Technical Issues With Submissions
Broken links or error messages with submission forms are a pain. This is especially true when the site has no trouble with blasting the contributor with daily automated content emails, but is unresponsive to inquiries about their broken submission process.
7. Scheduling Confusion
This may be the top complaint from contributors. For the love of all that is holy, TELL US WHEN YOU ARE PUBLISHING OUR POST, or at least provide a small ballpark window of time. This not only helps the contributor know when to promote it, but it allows us to practice good etiquette like setting aside time to promote it via social media, prepare and publish a teaser post, update our ‘Featured Writing’ pages etc. Many bloggers use a teaser post as their scheduled post on their blog calendar, and it helps to plan content when you know the date that your feature is going live. When a blogger expects a lot of traffic from a post, they may also want to post something special on their home page on the day a post goes live, and it certainly helps to have a heads up. The worst offending sites never respond that the piece has been accepted and the only way a contributor knows is to stumble across it or hear about it from a friend. In one case a blogger was told ‘a few weeks’ only to check back in a few weeks and find that it had been posted nearly 2 weeks prior!
8. No Badge
Contributors are typically excited about being featured on the sites they submit to, and they want that badge in their sidebar, showing that they are a contributor. Sites that don’t have badges at all or make you dig and beg for them can get annoying.
9. No Point of Contact
Sites that email you from a mystery submissions address letting you know you’ve been accepted can be frustrating. If you have any issues or questions about your submission, you have no way to reach a human and problems can arise.
On the flip side, we received lots of feedback on the types of host site behaviors contributors love to see (and ARE seeing!). Here are just a few. Sites that:
- Provide a chance to review the edited piece before it goes live
- Tag the contributor in social media
- Send a yes or no response within the timeline stated in submission guidelines
- Are responsive and provide an email (for a human), for contributors to address questions or concerns to once writing has been accepted
- Send a badge and publication date as well as any promotion expectations after a piece has been accepted
RELATED: 14 Ways To Piss Off An Editor
We know that not every site has the staff or time for these nice-to-haves in their process, but hopefully some editors will find this helpful in working with contributors. Now that both bloggers and editors have vented, let’s go forth and submit happily!